Estate of Myers
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Seth Millington, Thos. Rutledge, and Ernest Weyand, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
It appeared that the heirs at law of deceased are three daughters, Kate Roche, Sophia Drier and Ann Baker; Thomas M. Roche is a grandson of deceased, but is not entitled to succeed to any portion of the personal estate of deceased; he was nominated, in writing, by Kate Roche and Sophia Drier, each of whom is competent to act as ad ministratrix, and their written request was filed herein with the petition of said Thomas M. Eoehe, asking that letters he issued to him.
Ann Baker was competent to act as administratrix and she also prayed for letters, the petitions being heard together. The court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of DorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Turner v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McGilvary v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re Estate of HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Estate of OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- L'Hommedieu v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Grover v. Van LeeuwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Estate of ConnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Barrett v. BarrettWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.