Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Harrison

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1901No. S.F. No. 2688PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Deceased died in the state of Virginia, leaving a last will and testament, which was admitted to probate in that state, and letters testamentary thereon were issued to one A. B. Bevan, named in the will as executor thereof. An authenticated copy of the will was filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, where the deceased left estate, and Henry P. Umbsen petitioned for letters of administration with the will annexed, the foreign executor joining in the petition and requesting .the nomination of Umbsen. P. Boland, the public administrator of the city and county of San…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McGilvary v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Melzner v. TrucanoMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Estate of MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. In Re the Estate of MeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API