Legal Opinion

Estate of Connick

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1922No. S. F. No. 9949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem

This appeal is from an order of the superior court denying the petition of one Achsa J. Connick to be appointed administratrix of the estate of Catherine Matilda Connick, deceased, and granting the petition of Henry A. Hansen, public administrator of the county of Humboldt, to be appointed administrator of said estate. The facts as shown by the record are undisputed and are briefly these: Catherine Matilda Connick died on December 24, 1905, leaving as her sole heir at law her son, Amos H. Connick. On November 9, 1920, Amos H. Connick, being himself competent to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re the Estate of DorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In re Estate of CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Estate of Stevenson v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Monroe v. ShielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. L'Hommedieu v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Estate of HerriottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Grover v. Van LeeuwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Estate of DeBrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Estate of OravetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API