Legal Opinion
Heuck, Aud. v. State, Ex Rel.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1933No. 24218PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
On September 30, 1932, the General Assembly passed an act, 114 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, page 70, “To provide for reduction in compensation of certain elective officers,” etc., which was duly approved and filed in the office of the secretary of state on October 3, 1932. The act was not declared to be an emergency measure. So much thereof as is necessary to a decision in this case is as follows :
“Section 2. During the period beginning January 1, 1933, and ending December 31, 1934, the compensation of all judges which is fixed, limited or determined, in whole or in part, by sections 2251, 2251-1, 2252,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Royer v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Tuttle v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Neiswander v. BricknerOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Thrailkill v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Evans v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. MacK v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.