Legal Opinion
Neiswander v. Brickner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1927No. 19865PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Did the electors have the right to withdraw their names from the remonstrance at any time within the 30-day period allowed by Section 4736, General Code, for the filing of the remonstrance? And under Sections 4736 and 10216, General Code, could the electors exercise such right of withdrawal upon the Monday following the thirtieth day, which fell upon a Sunday?
These two sections of the Code read as follows:
“Sec. 4736. The county board of education may create a school district from one or more school districts or parts thereof, and in so doing shall make an equitable division of' the funds or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McGinn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Simkin v. ColeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Ayer v. KemperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Heuck, Aud. v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- McCarty v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.