State Ex Rel. MacK v. Guckenberger
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The question presented by the respondent’s demurrer is whether a statute, effective before the' commencement of the term of a common pleas judge, whereby his compensation is automatically increased during the term by reason of the increase of the population of his county as shown by a federal census effective after the beginning of the term, is in conflict with Section 14, Article IV of the Constitution, the pertinent part of which is as follows:
‘ ‘ The judges of the Supreme Court, and of the Court of Common Pleas, shall, at stated times, receive, for their services', such compensation as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. BooneSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commonwealth ex rel. Woodring v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Schneider v. LaffoonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Corbett v. Ohio Building AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hamilton v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.