Legal Opinion
MacManus v. A. E. Realty Partners
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1987No. G003232PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.
Frederick O. MacManus and Barbara-Helene Smith appeal orders (1) denying their application to allow a class action, (2) granting summary judgment against them on their cause of action under the Cartwright Act, (3) granting judgment on the pleadings to *1109and dismissal of Realty Escrow, Inc., and (4) denying them leave to amend their complaint.
I
In 1979, MacManus and Smith purchased a home from A. E. Realty Partners (AERP). The sales agreement required their signatures on escrow instructions to be provided by AERP.1 The forms were received bearing the name of Realty…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. v. Silldorf, BurdmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Cotherix, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Allison v. Dignity HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Kight v. CashCallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.