Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The principal question presented is whether the plaintiffs in this private antitrust action were barred from recovery by a doctrine known by the Latin phrase in pari delicto, which literally means “of equal fault.” The plaintiffs, petitioners here, were all dealers who had operated “Midas Muffler Shops” under sales agreements granted by respondent Midas, Inc. Their complaint charged that Midas had entered into a conspiracy with the other named defendants — its parent corporation International Parts Corp., two other subsidiaries, and six individual defendants who were officers or agents of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by629 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
624 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.