Legal Opinion

Foust v. McFairland

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 2005No. A04-760, A04-1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

698 N.W.2d 24 (2005)

Jeffrey L. FOUST, et al., Respondents,

v.

John R. McFARLAND, et al., Appellants.

Nos. A04-760, A04-1956.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 14, 2005.

Review Filed August 16, 2005.

Ronald I. Meshbesher, John P. Sheehy, Michael C. Snyder, Pamela J. Spaulding, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Paul V. Esposito (pro hac vice), Clausen Miller P.C., Chicago, IL; and Diane B. Bratvold, Rider Bennett, LLP; and Brian N. Johnson, Sheila T. Kerwin, Amanda M. Cialkowski, Halleland Lewis Nilan Sipkins & Johnson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Considered and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API