Legal Opinion
Searcy v. County of Oakland
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 30, 2010No. Case 09-13007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN COUNTS, REQUIRING ANSWERS TO THE COMPLAINT, AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
The defendants have raised several issues in their motions to dismiss this civil rights case presently pending before the Court. The main issue relating to the timeliness of the complaint — and whether the plaintiff has avoided the statute of limitations bar — presents the following question: Is an action “commenced” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Viola Chambers v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Elhady v. PewDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Zdebski v. SchmuckerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Billingsley v. DOE-1District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.