Elhady v. Pew
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss. The issues have been fully briefed. Because oral argument will not aid the decisional process, the motion will be decided based on the parties' briefing. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2); Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the *761reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts in this section are taken from Plaintiff Anas Elhady's Second Amended Complaint. Elhady brings a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Darwish v. PompeoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Elhady v. Unidentified CBP AgentsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Giles v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Ross v. AndreskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- XI v. HAUGENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021