Legal Opinion

Elhady v. Pew

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 1, 2019No. Case No. 17-cv-12969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss. The issues have been fully briefed. Because oral argument will not aid the decisional process, the motion will be decided based on the parties' briefing. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2); Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the *761reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts in this section are taken from Plaintiff Anas Elhady's Second Amended Complaint. Elhady brings a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darwish v. PompeoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
  2. Elhady v. Unidentified CBP AgentsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. Giles v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Ross v. AndreskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. XI v. HAUGENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API