Legal Opinion

State v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1975No. 754SC4PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends that the judgment should be arrested because the bill of indictment upon which he was tried and convicted was fatally defective. A motion in arrest of judgment is one made after verdict and to prevent entry of judgment, and is based upon the insufficiency of the indictment or some other fatal defect appearing on the face of the record. State v. McCollum, 216 N.C. 737, 6 S.E. 2d 503 (1940). A motion in arrest of judgment based upon such a defect may be made for the first time on appeal, and in the absence of a motion, the appellate court ex mero motu will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. . McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. . MundaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. State v. TartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. In RE PEOPLE v. JoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. KelsoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API