Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Lowe
Nebraska Supreme Court
Ebeob to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. The Pullman Palace Car Company is not liable either as a common carrier or asan innkeeper. {Blumv. Southern P. P. G Co., 1 Flippin [U. S.], 500; Pullman P. C. Co. v. Smith, 73- 111., 360; Woodruff S. & P. C. Co. v. Diehl, 84 Ind., 474; Clark v. Burns, 118 Mass., 275; Lewis v. N. Y. S. C. Co., 143 Id., 267; III. Cent.
Read the full summary
Ebeob to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. The Pullman Palace Car Company is not liable either as a common carrier or asan innkeeper. {Blumv. Southern P. P. G Co., 1 Flippin [U. S.], 500; Pullman P. C. Co. v. Smith, 73- 111., 360; Woodruff S. & P. C. Co. v. Diehl, 84 Ind., 474; Clark v. Burns, 118 Mass., 275; Lewis v. N. Y. S. C. Co., 143 Id., 267; III. Cent. B. Co. v. Handy, 63 Miss., 609; Pullman P. C. Co. v. Pollock, 69 Tex., 120; Pullman P. C. Co. v. Gaylord, 23 Am. L. Reg. [Ky.], 788; Same v. Gardner, 16 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 324.) At any rate the…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover the value of an overcoat, which, it is alleged, was lost or stolen from a Pullman car, in which the defendant in error was a passenger, on the Wabash Railway, from St. Louis to Council Bluffs. The court was requested to make special findings in the case, which it did, as follows:
“ I find, as the facts proven on the trial of this case: That on the 18th day of April, 1887, (he plaintiff took passage at St. Louis for Council Bluffs, on the Wabash & St. Louis R. R., and purchased a sleeping car ticket…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pinkerton v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Phillips v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Walling v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Wintermute v. ClarkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
- Carpenter v. TaylorNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1856
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Kearney Hotel Partners v. Richardson (In Re Kearney Hotel Partners)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Clancy v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Fox v. Windemere Hotel Apartment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Leon v. Kitchen Bros. Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.