Legal Opinion

Clancy v. Barker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1904No. 13,174PublishedCited by 27 opinions

ERROR to the district court for Douglas county: Guy R. 0. Read, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, O.

The plaintiff in his petition filed in the district court alleges, in effect, that the defendants were the proprietors and operated a hotel in the city of Omaha; that on the 12th day of January, 1902, he entered such hotel with his wife and infant son for a temporary sojourn therein, whereupon he and the said members of his family were received as guests in said hotel by the defendants; that afterwards, and while they were thus guests in said hotel, the plaintiff’s infant son entered a room of the hotel to speak or play with a porter or servant of the defendants, avIio, at the time,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  2. Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bryant v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Dwinelle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Chicago & Eastern Railroad v. FlexmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pittard Ex Rel. Pittard v. Four Seasons Motor Inn, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Kearney Hotel Partners v. Richardson (In Re Kearney Hotel Partners)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API