Legal Opinion
Medina v. Holguin
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2008No. 27,314PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff David Medina (Medina) appeals from an order of the district court granting a motion filed by Defendants Ray Holguin (Holguin) and WMA Securities, Inc. (WMAS) to compel arbitration. At issue in this appeal is the applicability of an arbitration provision in the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). The parties do not dispute their respective roles under this provision. See NASD Rule 10301(a) (effective through April 16, 2007), available at http://finra.complinet.com/en/ display/display_viewall.html?rbid=2403 & element — id=6014 &…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Fiser v. Dell Computer CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,173, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2803 Kevin Miller v. Dr. Charles W. FlumeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Multi-Financial Securities Corp. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benz v. Town Center Land, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ronay Family Limited Partnership v. TweedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Clay v. New Mexico Title Loans, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Camino Real Environmental Center, Inc. v. New Mexico Department of the EnvironmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.