Legal Opinion
Multi-Financial Securities Corp. v. King
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 6, 2004No. 03-15078PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge:
IFG Network Securities, Inc. (“IFG”) appeals the district court’s September 3, 2003, order compelling arbitration of its dispute -with Rex King, now deceased, and Rua King (“King”). On appeal, IFG argues that the district court erred by finding King entitled to arbitration under the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Code of Arbitration Procedure (“Code”) and by refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing to resolve alleged fact issues. We hold, generally, that the Code is a written agreement binding IFG to arbitrate and, specifically, that the instant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- E.T. Horn Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Abraham Inetianbor v. Cashcall, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Thomas v. WestlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ronay Family Limited Partnership v. TweedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mony Securities v. Leland BornsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.