Fiser v. Dell Computer Corporation
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} We granted certiorari to review whether Defendant Dell Computer Corporation’s Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act was properly granted. We hold that, in the context of small consumer claims that would be prohibitively costly to bring on an individual basis, contractual prohibitions on class relief are contrary to New Mexico’s fundamental public policy of encouraging the resolution of small consumer claims and are therefore unenforceable in this state. We reverse.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
{2} Plaintiff Robert…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Cordova v. World Finance Corp. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Investment Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.