Dumas v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
An inaccurate statement in the court’s memorandum of June 29, 1951 having been brought to its attention, the following substituted memorandum is filed in the action but no change in the judgment is required.
This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff moves the court for an order requiring the defendant to produce for inspection and copying all written medical reports to defendant concerning the physical condition of plaintiff.
Plaintiff shows the following as good cause for the requested order: In March of 1951, at the request of defendant, he voluntarily submitted to a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grover v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Keil v. HimesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Gillig v. Bymart-Tintair, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954