Legal Opinion

Gillig v. Bymart-Tintair, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 29, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion of the plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order requiring the defendant to produce and permit plaintiffs to inspect and copy:(1) A medical report of a physician for defendant’s insurance carrier relating to the examination of the plaintiff Adrienne Gillig made on, or about February 11, 1953, after the accident in controversy but before the commencement of the action.(2) Books, records, and documents relating to prior claims, complaints, or suits brought by others against defendant arising out of the use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Dumas v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API