Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Foster

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1936No. 4-4328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This action was hegnn by appellees, who are residents and owners of real property in Paving District No. 1 in the city of Bentonville, Arkansas, against the appellants for a restraining order, restraining appellants from wrongfully using State Aid Funds, and from discriminating between real property-owners in said improvement district.

The appellees’ property is not located on the State highway. The improvement district owes approximately $54,000 bonded indebtedness. This indebtedness is a lien on all the real property in the improvement district. The State of Arkansas delivered to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Smith v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Board of Street Improvement Dist. No. 315 v. Arkansas Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Lightle v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Black v. Street Improvement Dist. No. 2District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1941
  4. Gabriel v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Wood v. TobinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API