Smith v. Refunding Board of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
McHaney, Justice.
By this suit appellant seeks to enjoin the refunding board from issuing refunding obligations to those municipal improvement districts of this State entitled thereto under the provisions of act No. 248 of the Acts of 1931 (page 770). As a basis for this action, it is contended that, first, said act No. 248 is void for the reason that, as enrolled and printed,, it contains no enact-. ing clause, as is required by § 19 of article 5 of the Constitution, which provides that: “The style of the laws of the. State of Arkansas shall be: ‘Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sparling v. Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Sims v. WeldonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- State Note Board v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Refunding Board of Arkansas v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Pope v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Burton v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Page v. Street Improvement District No. 11Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Hays Construction Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.