Legal Opinion

Ledbetter v. Hall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1935No. 4-4149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellant, a property owner in Street Improvement District No. 508, city of Little Rock, which is a municipal improvement district, organized under the ordinances of the city of Little Rock, for the purpose of paving certain streets, about 5% miles in length, filed' suit against the appellees in the Pulaski Chancery Court, to restrain said appellees, their attorneys, agents, servants and employees, from undertaking to comply with the order of the State of Arkansas Refunding Board, and to restrain appellees from selling any of the refunding obligations at a price that would yield less than…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Refunding Board of Arkansas v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Beall v. Hudson County Water Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1911
  3. Board of Street Improvement Dist. No. 315 v. Arkansas Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. City of Fort Smith v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Jackson v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Howze v. HutchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. GUARDIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. RubinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API