State v. K. M.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
SERCOMBE, R J.
Following a hearing, appellant was determined to be mentally ill on the grounds that she was dangerous to herself and others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.130.1 On appeal, appellant contends that the court plainly erred in failing to sufficiently advise her of her rights under ORS 426.100(1). The state responds that the court did not plainly err because some of the required advice was given, and appellant was otherwise advised by her counsel about the nature of the proceedings. We agree with appellant that the trial court plainly erred in failing to advise her of all of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. S. M. B. (In re S. M. B.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018