Legal Opinion

State v. B. O.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 2016No. C150025MC; A159707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to herself and unable to provide for her basic personal needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to advise her of her right to subpoena witnesses as required by ORS 426.100(l).1 The state concedes that the court’s failure constitutes plain error. We agree and accept the state’s concession.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. V. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. R. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. R. R. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API