Kilpatrick v. Arrow Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION
DAWKINS, Senior District Judge.
At issue is plaintiff’s motion to remand filed on July 26, 1976. Plaintiff asserts (1) that defendant’s petition to remove the suit was filed untimely; and (2) that subject-matter jurisdiction is lacking because complete diversity of citizenship did not exist between plaintiff and one defendant when plaintiff first filed his complaint in State Court.(1) If a defendant wants to remove a suit to Federal Court, he must do so within thirty days of plaintiff’s original complaint or the date the suit first becomes removable. 1 When plaintiff first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Luther Weems v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Boesenberg v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Coditron Corp. v. AFA Protective Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Warren Bros. v. Community Building Corp. of Atlanta, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1974
- Stamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heniford v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- Erdey v. American Honda Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983
- Peters v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Scott v. Communications Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
- Smith v. Union National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.