Legal Opinion

City of Pendleton v. Kerns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1982No. 81-127, CA A24312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioners, City of Pendleton (City) and Fredrick S. and Mary Anne Hill, seek judicial review of a decision by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that reversed and remanded the City’s decision to annex a parcel of land belonging to petitioners Hill to the city. We affirm.

Pendleton City Ordinance No. 3192, adopted on October 20, 1981, annexed approximately 12.36 acres of land owned by petitioners Hill (the Hill property) to the city. The Pendleton City Council adopted as its own the Pendleton Planning Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, which had recommended annexation.

Resp…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Aschenbrenner v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Bryant v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API