Legal Opinion
Aschenbrenner v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 9, 1977No. 76T-S-592, CA 7417PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The issue presented in this unemployment compensation appeal is whether the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) erred in ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because of having voluntarily left his employment without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). 1
The essential facts are set forth in EAB’s findings of fact.
"(1) The claimant was employed by this employer and its predecessor in interest from May 1948 to July 30, 1976 at the last position of saw filer at the rate of $8.42 an hour. (2) Approximately two years prior to his separation from work a third shift was added. (3) The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Grigsby v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Wilton v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- McCain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Balduyck v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Barron v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Ruiz v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Beaverton School District No. 48 v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Hamilton v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF DEPT. OF LABORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.