Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Wood

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1952No. 38197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Bills were filed by six complainants against the receiver of the National Acceptance Corporation, Pañi A. Scliumpert and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company. Others were named for the purpose of impounding alleged assets of the corporation. The suits were filed pursuant to our Blue Sky Law, Code 1942, Secs. 5360 et seq., and their chief purpose was to enforce bonds issued by the said surety under that law. ■ The suits were consolidated for trial. Decree was rendered adjudicating the liabilities of the surety respectively to the several complainants, all of whom were found to have been induced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irving v. Bankers' Mortgage Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bankers' Mortgage Co. v. McMullanMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McCrosky v. RiggsMississippi Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Mobile Home Corporation v. LittleMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Eunice v. Johnson, Cross-Appellants v. Mark Yerger, Cross-Appellee, J. D. Wilson and Kenneth H. Tribble, Defendants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Hederi v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API