In Re Bustos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
In conjunction with his direct appeal, John Paul Bustos (defendant) has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking presentence credit served pursuant to Penal Code section 2900.5. Because we determine, pursuant to the decision of our Supreme Court of In re Joyner (1989) 48 Cal.3d 487,489, 493-495 [256 Cal.Rptr. 785, 769 P.2d 967], that defendant’s presentence custody was due in part to an arrest warrant issued by the Board of Prison Terms prior to his arrest in this case, the trial court correctly denied any presentence credit.
II. Procedural and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. AmbroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ShabazzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.