People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, J. *
On appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence of nine years’ imprisonment, Melton Jake Williams II contends the trial court erred in denying presentence credit for time served. The Attorney General concedes appellant is entitled to the amount of credit which he seeks. In the published part of this opinion, we agree with the parties, and hold that presentence custody cannot be attributed to “mixed conduct” (In re Nickles (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 415, 419 [282 Cal.Rptr. 411] [shifting to defendant the burden of proving entitlement to presentence custody credit therefor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. BrighamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- In Re NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. StumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.