Legal Opinion

Dyecraftsmen, Inc. v. Feinberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 11, 1971PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brauchek, J"

These actions of contract and tort are before us on the defendants’ exceptions after jury verdicts for the plaintiff on each of four counts for the same cause of action: breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, breach of contract to supply steam, trespass, and constructive eviction. The exceptions relate to evidence admitted on behalf of the plaintiff, to the denial of the defendants’ motions for directed verdicts, and to denial of the defendants’ requests for instructions.

There was evidence of the following facts. The plaintiff operated a commercial dyeing business, using large…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charles E. Burt, Inc. v. Seven Grand Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Rombola v. CosindasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Sawyer & Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cherubino v. Board of Registration of ChiropractorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Northern Associates, Inc. v. KileyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Wiesman v. HillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  4. City Welding & Manufacturing Co. v. Gidley-Eschenheimer Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Cesco Manufacturing Corp. v. Norcross, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API