Legal Opinion
Cesco Manufacturing Corp. v. Norcross, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 28, 1979PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
In this action alleging the breach of a contract for the manufacture of customized display racks for greeting cards, the trial judge found, relying on G. L. c. 106, § 2-709, that the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount equal to the price as reduced by the net proceeds received from the sale of the undelivered fixtures and the expenses saved in consequence of the buyer’s breach, plus an award of incidental damages. We affirm, but under G. L. c. 106, § 2-708(2).
The case was originally a jury action and was referred to a master to make findings "which shall not be final.” After filing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Daley v. J. F. White Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Dyecraftsmen, Inc. v. FeinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Nobs Chemical, U.S.A., Inc. And Calmon-Hill Trading Corp., Cross-Appellees v. Koppers Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Islamic Republic of Iran, Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. The Boeing Company and Logistics Support CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Tigg Corporation, in 91-3345 v. Dow Corning Corporation, in 91-3232 and 91-3344Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Karen Construction Co. v. LizotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.