Legal Opinion

State v. Villalon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 1975No. 44548PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying defendants motion for a new trial and from a conviction for selling marijuana, a controlled substance, in violation of Minn. St. 152.09, subd. 1(1). We affirm.

The principal issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to require the state to disclose the identity of the informant who introduced defendant to the undercover narcotics agent. We hold that the record does not compel a finding that disclosure of the informant’s identity would be at all relevant and helpful to the defense or essential to a fair…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. James G. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. James Corbett Churder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. HavertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API