Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Tolar & Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1923No. 924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHightower, C. J.

The appellant, C. B. Stewart, has made in his brief a statement of the nature and result of this suit, the correctness of which is not questioned by the appellees, and which we adopt, as follows:

“Plaintiff below, appellant here, sued the defendants, Tolar & Daniel, alleging that defendants by a written contract had purchased certain timber from Mrs. Laura Stewart Hardy at an agreed price of $4,000. $1,000 in cash and $3,000 in monthly installments of $150 each, and in his original petition and his first supplemental petition alleged that all payments had accrued and that said defendants were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Anderson v. SillimanTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hale v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. M. H. Lauchheimer & Sons v. CoopTexas Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  2. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Hunt v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API