Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Tolar & Daniel
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 9, 1923No. 924PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHightower, C. J.
The appellant, C. B. Stewart, has made in his brief a statement of the nature and result of this suit, the correctness of which is not questioned by the appellees, and which we adopt, as follows:
“Plaintiff below, appellant here, sued the defendants, Tolar & Daniel, alleging that defendants by a written contract had purchased certain timber from Mrs. Laura Stewart Hardy at an agreed price of $4,000. $1,000 in cash and $3,000 in monthly installments of $150 each, and in his original petition and his first supplemental petition alleged that all payments had accrued and that said defendants were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Anderson v. SillimanTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Hale v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- M. H. Lauchheimer & Sons v. CoopTexas Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dorman v. Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Hunt v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.