Legal Opinion

Rubicon Global Ventures, Inc. v. Chongqing Zongshen Group Import/Export Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 30, 2016No. 3:09-cv-00818-MO (Lead Case)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, Chief United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Ninth Circuit to make a factual determination of Plaintiffs’ damages in Docket Nos. 3:05-cv-01809 (“Rubicon I”), 3:09-cv-00818 (“Rubicon II"), and 3:09-cv-01397 (“Rubicon III”). Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Entry of Default Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claims [303], After considering the information and evidence presented at the hearing, I find Plaintiffs’ sufficiently proved damages in the amount of $916,650. For the reasons stated below, however, I GRANT…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arman v. JN Saipan CNMI, LLCDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2022
  2. Davis v. City of Idaho FallsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
  3. Genc v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLCDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2022
  4. Hawks v. SeeryDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Maney v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API