Legal Opinion
Muhammad v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2301 (RBW)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Ali S. Muhammad, the pro se plaintiff in this civil lawsuit, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), alleging, inter alia, that the FDIC “improperly disallowed [the plaintiffs cjlaims against Washington Mutual Bank” under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (the “FIRREA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(5)(D)© (2006). Complaint (the “Compl.”) at 13-14. Currently…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jeong Seon Han v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Tyson v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Fontaine v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.