Legal Opinion
Fontaine v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1638PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Julie Elice Fontaine (“Plaintiff’ or “Fontaine”), who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against five defendants— Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon, MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A., and Blank Rome, LLP (together, “Defendants”)— challenging the foreclosure of her property located at 909 Glendora Drive, Oceanside, CA 92057 (the “Property”). (See Compl., ECF No. 1; Ex. 1 to Compl., ECF No. 1-1, at 2.) Fontaine filed the instant action in federal court after the California…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Williams v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Stoller v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- B.D. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Baptichon v. U.S. Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.