Isidore Zeiger v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
The issue is how much leave plaintiff is entitled to be compensated for upon his reinstatement after wrongful discharge. The case is before us on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment and the facts are undisputed. Plaintiff, an Army Signal Supply Agency employee, was suspended August 19, 1953, and removed as a “security risk” on August 5, 1954. On May 12, 1958, plaintiff, following appeal, was reinstated.
Plaintiff has received pay for the period of his suspension and removal. At that time he had 82 hours of annual leave to his credit. At the time of his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- William Vincent Vitarelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Hynning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Prosterman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Ernest Paroczay v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Ralph Russell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Warren G. Schaller v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Julius H. Schmidt, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.