Legal Opinion
Julius H. Schmidt, Jr. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 12, 1970No. 398-67PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover 21 days of accumulated leave computed on the pay of a Captain, allegedly due as the result of the correction of his military records. Defendant contends that plaintiff has been paid all that was due him under 10 U.S.C. § 1552, as the result of the correction of his military records. For the reasons stated below, we believe plaintiff is not entitled to recover.
Plaintiff was promoted to Captain, United States Air Force, on June 7, 1953. Having been twice passed over for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Egan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- William Vincent Vitarelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Hynning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Isidore Zeiger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rawlins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- PalmerUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Norman E. Mai, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992