Legal Opinion

Prosterman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1959No. 511-57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

The plaintiff sues for additional salary to which, he says, he is entitled under the applicable statutes. Prior to September 2,1952 he held a GS-14 position in the Department of Commerce, in the classified competitive Civil Service, and his salary was $10,000 per annum. On that date he transferred to the Mutual Security Agency and was appointed a Foreign Service Reserve Officer at an annual salary of $10,250.

The Act of August 13, 1946, C. 957, Title V, § 528, 60 Stat. 1010,22 U. S. C. § 928 provides:

Upon the termination of the assignment of a Reserve officer assigned from any Government…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Hynning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Isidore Zeiger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Isidore Zeiger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API