Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Cramer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 1998No. 82, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

In the instant case, we are called upon to determine whether a beneficiary under a will may maintain a cause of action for professional malpractice against an attorney retained by the personal representative of the testator’s estate. We recently held that, as a matter of law, a nonclient, testamentary beneficiary could not maintain a cause of action for professional malpractice against the testator’s attorney for negligently drafting the testator’s will or providing negligent estate planning advice where there was a lack of privity between the beneficiary and the attorney.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Copenhaver v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Noble v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Prescott v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Roberts v. FeareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API