Legal Opinion
Orozco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 29, 1972No. Civ. 72 1217PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ATKINS, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on defendant’s motion for a summary judgment. The Court has considered the memoranda submitted by both parties, as well as the affidavits in support of and in opposition to the motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the F.R.Civ.P. It is the considered opinion of this Court that summary judgment must be granted for the defendant.
At the outset the Court acknowledges those cases that hold, and correctly so, that summary judgment is not to be granted if there remains “a genuine issue as to any material fact.”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patricia Ann Lundeen, General Guardian of Persons and Estates of Maureen Joan Cordner and Michael Joseph Cordner v. France Jeanne CordnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- The Greyhound Corporation v. Excess Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Hoffman v. Illinois Nat. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- American Empire Insurance Company of South Dakota v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doyle v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- De Ferrari v. Government Employees Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Jensen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Griffin v. Stonewall Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Lockwood v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.