Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Porter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 8926DC219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Plaintiff, driving a vehicle owned by Janice G. McGlen and insured by Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, suffered injuries as a consequence of a three-car collision caused by defendant Porter, an uninsured motorist. His suit as an unnamed insured under McGlen’s policy against the alleged uninsured motorist for medical payments was answered by Aetna in its own name as G.S. 20-279.21(b)(3)a permits. In answering Aetna also moved for sum mary judgment based upon plaintiffs failure to comply with policy provisions mandating that:

A person seeking any coverage must:

1. Cooperate with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Orozco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dennis Vanhaaren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Guessford v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. IrvinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  4. BOWYER BY BOWYER v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bowyer ex rel. Bowyer v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API