American Empire Insurance Company of South Dakota v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Circuit Judge:
Fidelity and Deposit (F & D) sought a declaratory judgment to have its liability determined on a fidelity bond issued by it to certain named insureds as defendants. To avoid a multiplicity of suits in various courts, it was stipulated that certain parties claiming to have interests protected by the bond be permitted to intervene.1 The District Court rendered summary judgment against the intervenors on their claims and their counterclaims, holding that they were neither named insureds in, nor third party beneficiaries of the bond. This appeal followed. We affirm.
The facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- The Greyhound Corporation v. Excess Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Wright v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
- Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Three Garden Village Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Lee A. Everhart v. Drake Management, Inc., Union Commerce, Defendant-Third Party v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ronnau v. Caravan International CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.