Legal Opinion

Jensen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1984No. 83CA0243PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES * , Justice.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant insurance company. The plaintiffs’ claim, under a personal insurance protection policy (PIP policy) issued by defendant, was based on their allegation that defendant had willfully and wantonly refused to pay fully for certain treatment for personal injuries sustained by the wife in two automobile accidents. We affirm.

It was undisputed at trial that the wife was involved in an automobile accident on January 2, 1981, and that defendant paid her initial medical expenses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Orozco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  3. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Huntt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Adams v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Otani v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API