Legal Opinion
Burns v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1921No. Civ. No. 2278PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment of non-suit. The action was brought originally against five defendants: The Southern Pacific Company, George H. Jackson, Jackson M. Diggs, W. G. McRoberts, and F. G. Prinderville, but on the first trial a nonsuit was granted as to Diggs, Jackson, and McRoberts, the jury exonerated the Southern Pacific Company, and rendered a verdict against Prinderville for the sum of two thousand dollars. An appeal was taken from said judgment of nonsuit and it was affirmed by this court as to Diggs and McRoberts but was reversed as to the defendant, George H. Jackson. (Burns v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daly v. WedemeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Westerfeld v. New York Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Burns v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by19 opinions
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Burns v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- In Re Cummings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.