In Re Cummings' Estate
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Execution and Authentication of Will: The statutory requirements relative to the execution of a will are all of equal importance, and all must be observed. (In re Noyes' Estate,40 Mont. 178, 105 P. 1013; see, also, Gilbert v. Knox, 52 N.Y. 125;Remsen v. Brinckerhoff, 26 Wend. (N.Y.) 325, 37 Am. Dec. 251; In re Hitchler's Will, 25 Misc. Rep. 365, 2 Gibb. 589;55 N Y Supp. 642; In re Bryant's Estate, 14 N.Y. Supp. 917;Farleigh v. Kelly, 28 Mont. 421, 63 L.R.A. 319, 72 P. 756.)
Mental Unsoundness: If the testator is so weak in body that his mind is not capable of grasping the necessary facts he…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ginter v. GinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Silver's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Bragg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- Federal Land Bank v. GreenMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Mickich's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Cosgrove's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.