Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Slick

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1914No. 173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John M. Hansen against Edwin E. Slick. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed a bill under the provisions of section 4915 of the Revised Statutes (U. S. Compiled Statutes, 1901, *165page 3392). The defendant has filed his answer, and the case has come on for trial under the rules. The bill of complaint sets forth that the complainant was the original inventor of a new and useful improvement in a method of reworking worn forged car wheels, that he made due application therefor, and that pending his application his claims were adjudged to interfere with claims of a certain application filed by the defendant for a method of treating steel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Frasch v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Davis v. GarrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1907
  4. Johnson v. MueserSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. Hansen v. SlickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  3. D. O. Haynes & Co. v. Druggists' CircularCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Tide Water Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API