Legal Opinion
Davis v. Garrett
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided April 9, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity. On application for final decree.
1Opinion of the Court
TANNING, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this cause is filed under the provisions of section 4915 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3392]. The defendant has entered appearance, but has not answered the bill. On-December 26, 1906, an order that the bill be taken pro confesso was entered under the provisions of equity rule No. 18. Application is now made by the complainants for a final decree. Section 4915 is as follows:
“Whenever a patent on application is refused, either by the Commissioner of Patents or by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia upon appeal from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Butler v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
- Southern Pac. R. v. TempleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Senitha v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Dover v. GreenwoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1907
- Dover v. GreenwoodDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1910
- Hansen v. SlickDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.