Legal Opinion

Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & Municipalities

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 2011No. 16 WAP 2009PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice ORIE MELVIN.

We granted review to determine whether it is a violation of public policy to exclude from underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage a claim by an individual eligible for workers’ compensation benefits. For the following reasons, we conclude that a workers’ compensation exclusion in an employer-sponsored insurance policy violates public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.

The facts pertinent to our review are undisputed. On October 31, 2002, Appellant, Frank Heller (“Heller”) 1, was severely injured in an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Global Reinsurance Corp of AmeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Williams v. Geico Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. AAA Mid-Atlantic Insurance v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. TIG Insurance v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Estate of O'Connell ex rel. O'Connell v. Progressive Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API